posted
I’ve been using some AI nudifiers recently, and while they do a pretty good job, the results aren’t always consistent. For instance, one time I used a photo where the lighting wasn’t great, and the prediction was way off. Other times, the tool seemed to predict body shape almost perfectly. I’m starting to think that things like pose and lighting play a big role. Has anyone figured out what really impacts how well these tools work?
Posts: 25 | Registered: Feb 2025 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
Absolutely, lighting and pose are huge factors. I’ve noticed that the AI tools tend to struggle with images where the body isn’t fully visible or where there are too many distractions in the background. I’ve used https://cloth-off.ai/ a few times, and it works best when the body is clearly defined and the lighting is even. If the photo has weird angles or shadows, the AI tends to make mistakes. But it’s still impressive for most standard photos.
Posts: 25 | Registered: Feb 2025 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
It’s clear that the AI is learning and getting better, but there’s still a lot of guesswork involved. When there’s not enough data for the algorithm, it fills in the blanks with its own assumptions. Simple, clean images will always give the best results, but once you start complicating the photo with different angles, the accuracy drops. It's fascinating to see how AI can adapt, though.
Posts: 24 | Registered: Feb 2025 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
